Notice of Rescission (Nevada)
Frontmatter
kind: letter
title: Notice of Rescission (Nevada)
jurisdiction: NV
respondent_type: person
code: rescission_notice__nevada
confidential: false
questionnaire:
BEGIN:
_: person__client
person__client:
_: custom_datetime__offer_date
custom_datetime__offer_date:
_: custom_datetime__completion_date
custom_datetime__completion_date:
_: custom_datetime__discovery_date
custom_datetime__discovery_date:
_: custom_datetime__notice_date
custom_datetime__notice_date:
_: END
END: {}
prompts:
offer_date: On what date was the doughnut offered?
completion_date: On what date was the remainder of the doughnut consumed?
discovery_date: On what date did the client learn of the soul-conveyance term?
notice_date: What is the date of this notice?
workflow:
BEGIN:
_: lawyer_review
lawyer_review:
_: END
END: {}
Body
Notice of Rescission (Nevada)
Arrow keys or Space step through the document. Click a paragraph to highlight it.
NOTICE OF RESCISSION
FIXTURE DOCUMENT. This is a sample rendered from a notation template in the Navigator sample project. Cruller v. Prine is a simulated matter, this notice is addressed to no one, and nothing in it is legal advice.
To: Wendell Prine
From: {{person__client}}
Date: {{custom_datetime__notice_date}}
Matter: Cruller v. Prine — Count II
The instrument
On {{custom_datetime__offer_date}} you offered the undersigned one glazed doughnut over the hedge dividing the parties' properties. You described the doughnut only as "neat." You did not state, and the undersigned did not know, that the doughnut was said to carry a term conveying the undersigned's soul.
The undersigned took a partial bite on that date and set the remainder aside. The remainder was consumed on {{custom_datetime__completion_date}}.
Grounds for rescission
The purported agreement is voidable, and is hereby rescinded, on each of the following independent grounds.
- Fraudulent concealment of a material term. Assent runs only to terms the offeree had a reasonable opportunity to read. A term placed inside the instrument, where it cannot be reached without destroying the thing being accepted, is not such a term. Describing the instrument as merely "neat" converted that silence into an affirmative misrepresentation.
- No meeting of the minds. The undersigned never assented to the conveyance of anything, having never been told that a conveyance was proposed.
- Unconscionability. The consideration received was one doughnut.
No affirmance
Consumption of the remainder on {{custom_datetime__completion_date}} was not an affirmance of the purported agreement. Knowledge of the material facts constituting the fraud is an essential requirement of waiver or election, and the undersigned first learned of the term on {{custom_datetime__discovery_date}} — after the instrument had been consumed in full.
Timeliness
An action for relief on the ground of fraud accrues upon the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts constituting the fraud. This notice is served promptly after that discovery.
Demand
Demand is made that you confirm in writing, within fourteen days, that you assert no interest of any kind in the soul of the undersigned. Tender of restitution for the doughnut is available on request.
{{person__client}}
By: ______________________________
Questionnaire
Try answering this
Sample matter: Acme LLC — nothing you type below is saved anywhere.
- 1This step records the client.
- 2On what date was the doughnut offered?
- 3On what date was the remainder of the doughnut consumed?
- 4On what date did the client learn of the soul-conveyance term?
- 5What is the date of this notice?
Step 1 of 5
This step records the client.
Workflow
Sample runs — illustrative only. This notation's real activity is never shown on a public page.
lawyer_review
Received event `_` from `BEGIN`.
Event `_` — transitioned to `END`.
lawyer_review
Received event `_` from `BEGIN`.
Awaiting its next event.